Important: Read this before posting to this forum

  1. This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
  2. There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
  3. Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
    1. Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
    2. Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
    3. Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
    4. Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
  4. If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
    1. provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
    2. posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. This may take a day or two at busy times. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.

Interpretation of coefficients

Ask questions about the results reported after estimation. If the output includes errors, please include your model code if possible.
Post Reply
Patrick_K
Posts: 9
Joined: 14 May 2022, 14:20

Interpretation of coefficients

Post by Patrick_K »

Dear Stephane,

just a general question to recheck:

If I have two different coefficients for two different attributes:

b_1 -0.54
b_2 -0.13

Can it be derived from that that the b_1 has more influence on the utility for the respondents so that it is more important to the respondents than b_2 (even if the attributes in the DCE have very different units; months and €)?

Thanks for your help.
stephanehess
Site Admin
Posts: 998
Joined: 24 Apr 2020, 16:29

Re: Interpretation of coefficients

Post by stephanehess »

hi

no, it cannot. All it tells you is that ONE UNIT of attribute 1 has more influence than ONE UNIT of attribute 2. So this all depends on the units, etc

Stephane
--------------------------------
Stephane Hess
www.stephanehess.me.uk
Patrick_K
Posts: 9
Joined: 14 May 2022, 14:20

Re: Interpretation of coefficients

Post by Patrick_K »

1. So it also cannot be said that they are more sensitive to the one attribute than to the other?

2. But within an Latent class model where b_1 is 0.69 for class A and b_1 is 0.12 for class B it can indeed be derived that for respondents in class A b_1 has higher positive influence on utility than for respondents of class B, right?
stephanehess
Site Admin
Posts: 998
Joined: 24 Apr 2020, 16:29

Re: Interpretation of coefficients

Post by stephanehess »

1. Again, it depends on the units. Imagine that I have b_cost = -0.1 and b_time = -0.05. You can't say that cost matters more than time as it depends on the units. Imagine that cost is in € and time is in minutes. Then what the above is telling us is that €1 is more important than 1 minute, but obviously not that cost is more important than time.

2. No, you cannot compare individual coefficients as there could be scale differences between classes. You can only compare relative values, so e.g. compare the relative impact of time over cost in class 1 with that in class 2

All this is covered in standard textbooks on choice modelling
--------------------------------
Stephane Hess
www.stephanehess.me.uk
Post Reply