Important: Read this before posting to this forum

  1. This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
  2. There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
  3. Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
    1. Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
    2. Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
    3. Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
    4. Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
  4. If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
    1. provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
    2. posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. This may take a day or two at busy times. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.

Estimation fails with increasing number of draws

Ask questions about how to estimate models and how to change your settings for estimation.
Post Reply
hankmoody
Posts: 1
Joined: 02 May 2023, 13:58

Estimation fails with increasing number of draws

Post by hankmoody »

Hi

I am running a MMNL model with 5 random parameters (all negative lognormal) on a panel dataset with 500,000 observations and 3200 individuals. I am running models on a 40 core machine, but the estimation (BHHH) crashes when I specify more than 150 draws (MLHS draws). I have set gradient comparison, Hessian calculation, and the scaling parameters to FALSE.

My question is whether 150 draws are enough for 5 random parameters and whether I should be using different draw types and/or estimation routines. Also, would bootstrapping the estimation on fewer draws be advisable or bad practice?

Thanks for your help!
stephanehess
Site Admin
Posts: 998
Joined: 24 Apr 2020, 16:29

Re: Estimation fails with increasing number of draws

Post by stephanehess »

Apologies for the slow reply.

This is an extremely large dataset and you are likely to run out of memory. 150 draws is a very small number of draws, and I would consider using sampling of decision-makers with a larger number of draws
--------------------------------
Stephane Hess
www.stephanehess.me.uk
Post Reply