Important: Read this before posting to this forum

  1. This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
  2. There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
  3. Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
    1. Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
    2. Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
    3. Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
    4. Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
  4. If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
    1. provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
    2. posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. This may take a day or two at busy times. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.

Search found 1049 matches

by stephanehess
14 May 2020, 20:30
Forum: Model specification
Topic: How to choose random parameters for MMNL model
Replies: 3
Views: 6040

Re: How to choose random parameters for MMNL model

Dear Shan it is always impossible to know a priori which parameters are the right ones in terms of allowing for random heterogeneity. It is quite possible that random heterogeneity exists for most or all your coefficients. If you only allow for random heterogeneity in some of them, you will of cours...
by stephanehess
14 May 2020, 14:53
Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
Topic: ICLV model scenario (simulation) analysis
Replies: 4
Views: 23066

Re: ICLV model scenario (simulation) analysis

Hi Junghwan as discussed by Chorus & Kroesen, it is not advisable to make a change to the latent attitude in forecasting as the scale of this arbitrary. So e.g. a 10% increase is not a meaningful concept. What we did in the 2018 paper is to look at a situation where everyone adopted the attitude...
by stephanehess
14 May 2020, 14:45
Forum: Model specification
Topic: Between subject design
Replies: 3
Views: 5956

Re: Between subject design

Hi Dominik so what you are doing here is to allow for differencesin the value for the ASCs and the marginal utility coefficients as a function of the condition. That's the right thing to do. When you allow for differences in all terms, then this is equivalent to estimating two separate models, but y...
by stephanehess
12 May 2020, 16:13
Forum: Installation and updating
Topic: Installing Apollo from zip file
Replies: 3
Views: 12252

Re: install a package from zip file

Hi Sara

you need to install from the binaries rather than the soruce file

Best wishes

Stephane
by stephanehess
12 May 2020, 13:40
Forum: Installation and updating
Topic: Installing Apollo from zip file
Replies: 3
Views: 12252

Re: install a package from zip file

Hi Sara

you need to use / instead of \

It is also possible to do this via the menu in RStudio (tools-install packages) which will make it easier for you

Stephane
by stephanehess
12 May 2020, 13:39
Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
Topic: Integration of covariates into HB estimation
Replies: 3
Views: 5751

Re: Integration of covariates into HB estimation

Hi apollo_prediction uses only the posterior means, so I would be very careful in using it in the situation where some of your marginal utility parameters are actually given by sums of multiple model parameters. Even if that wasn't the case, you should be very careful with using posterior means as t...
by stephanehess
12 May 2020, 13:31
Forum: Errors during model validation and/or estimation.
Topic: Identification problem
Replies: 1
Views: 4493

Re: Identification problem

Hi Eduardo

you have included the same terms in both utilities, so the model is not identified. Apollo is telling you that b_female (the first parameter it tries) cannot change the log-likelihood as it influences both utilities in the same way.

Best wishes

Stephane
by stephanehess
11 May 2020, 21:32
Forum: Model specification
Topic: Multivariate Ordered Logit Model
Replies: 12
Views: 16654

Re: Multivariate Ordered Logit Model

Hi 1. Your model is simply combining a number of different ordered logit models. You are not making any links between these components, so I wouldn't really refer to it as multivariate. If you want to create links between the models, you could incorporate a latent variable, for example. 2. The funct...
by stephanehess
11 May 2020, 21:27
Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
Topic: Integration of covariates into HB estimation
Replies: 3
Views: 5751

Re: Integration of covariates into HB estimation

Hi Apollo relies on RSGHB for Bayesian estimation, and the posteriors are for each individual coefficient rather than an addition or other transformation involving multiple coefficients. With Normals, you could add up the posterior means, but would you really want to use a Normal for price anyway? W...
by stephanehess
10 May 2020, 12:18
Forum: Errors during model validation and/or estimation.
Topic: Error in Bayesian estimation
Replies: 6
Views: 9430

Re: Problem with Bayesian estimator

Hi Raffaele is this simply a case of you trying to run the whole file in one go? Try running it only to the estimate line, then it will prompt you to confirm whether you want to proceed with estimation - see the Estimate Model? (Y/N) prompt in your output. If you were running the whole file in one g...