ApolloChoiceModelling forum

Thank you for the advices. We will try the log-uniform;

Damien

Thank you for you message and the precisions.

Actually, we wanted the price attribute to be positive (price is a subsidy), so it makes senses to use log-normal.

I ran a model with the previously given code, and I get the following results (see below):

This "looks" satisfactory, but I have two ...

We are trying to estimate a model in the WTA space. (price is a subsidy). To do that, we are making the hypothesis that the price (subsidy) paramater is distributed as a log-normal, and that the other parameters are normally distributed and correlated (including with the price parameter) and can ...

I am not sure a generic solution was found for this problem?
I have the same kind of message (also for a LC-MXL ANA type of model). I can also share my data and model if needed

I am trying to develop a model testing for ANA (using a LC-Mixed Logit model) to avoid inflating the ANA.
Given the high number of possible classes, I am using the methodology proposed by Hole, 2011. This gave me plausible results.
From this model, I wanted to test the idea that attendance might ...

Indeed, I haven't put enough thought on this, as this will make the distribution start at at 1
Thank you.

Thank you for the clarification about the correlation. For the offset, I assumed that it was equal to zero, but I guess it is better to verify this!

Damien

In a WTP-space mixed logit model, I want to test a log-uniform distribution for the price attribute '(rationale: always positive and avoid long tail of log-normal);

I have two questions (related code below)

1. Is the specification "exp(b_lambda * draws_lambda)" correct if I want a log-uniform ...

It now runs well including using multithreading. Thank you. Damien

Dear Prof Hess,
Just sent a sample data set on your gmail address and contact@apollochoicemodelling.com I hope this will reach you. Thank you.
Damien