Hi
apologies for the slow reply. We believe we have fixed this issue in the latest development version - can you try it by downloading from http://apollochoicemodelling.com/code.html
Thanks
Stephane & David
Important: Read this before posting to this forum
- This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
- There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
- Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
- Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
- Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
- Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
- Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
- Users can check which version they are running by entering packageVersion("apollo").
- Then check what is the latest full release (not development version) at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html.
- To update to the latest official version, just enter install.packages("apollo"). To update to a development version, download the appropriate binary file from http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html, and install the package from file
- If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
- provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
- posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. This may take a day or two at busy times. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.
Search found 1059 matches
- 22 May 2024, 12:12
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: Hybrid_LC_with_OL_example_data
- Replies: 1
- Views: 35
- 22 May 2024, 12:09
- Forum: Errors during model validation and/or estimation.
- Topic: Error (pi * p : non-conformable arrays) while estimating Hybrid LC with OL
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17
Re: Error (pi * p : non-conformable arrays) while estimating Hybrid LC with OL
Hi
apologies for the slow reply. We believe we have fixed this issue in the latest development version - can you try it by downloading from http://apollochoicemodelling.com/code.html
Thanks
Stephane & David
apologies for the slow reply. We believe we have fixed this issue in the latest development version - can you try it by downloading from http://apollochoicemodelling.com/code.html
Thanks
Stephane & David
- 22 May 2024, 11:53
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: Joint Estimation for Dual Response Survey with Two Segments
- Replies: 3
- Views: 107
Re: Joint Estimation for Dual Response Survey with Two Segments
Hi
the two separate models is the same as if you had a fully segmented model. So you can use a LR test to compare the sum of the two separaet models against your generic model without differences. The degrees of freedom would be the additional parameters needed for two separate models
Stephane
the two separate models is the same as if you had a fully segmented model. So you can use a LR test to compare the sum of the two separaet models against your generic model without differences. The degrees of freedom would be the additional parameters needed for two separate models
Stephane
- 22 May 2024, 11:51
- Forum: Data preparation, processing and pre-estimation analysis
- Topic: Handling 'Not Available' Data
- Replies: 5
- Views: 323
Re: Handling 'Not Available' Data
Hi
given your small sample size, this is a good approach
Stephane
given your small sample size, this is a good approach
Stephane
- 22 May 2024, 11:50
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: post-estimation scenario analysis
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9858
Re: post-estimation scenario analysis
Hi 1. Not sure how you want to calculate WTP if you have different cost variables. With a random cost, you can use the ratio of different elements in apollo_unconditionals. 2. It means that at the sample average, these are the weights for the classes. Latent class does NOT put each person into one c...
- 22 May 2024, 11:47
- Forum: Models and estimation
- Topic: Use indirectly related RP data in SP model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 145
Re: Use indirectly related RP data in SP model
You could use a set of logit models for this, each time with the choice between the values you show them
- 22 May 2024, 11:43
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: ANA_EM has no covariance matrix
- Replies: 3
- Views: 761
Re: ANA_EM has no covariance matrix
Hi why are you using: V[["class_a"]] = (exp((delta_a_k1 + gamma_commute_a_k1*commute + gamma_car_av_a_k1*car_availability)*Q[1,1])*exp((delta_a_k2 + gamma_commute_a_k2*commute + gamma_car_av_a_k2*car_availability)*Q[2,1]))/((exp(delta_a_k1 + gamma_commute_a_k1*commute + gamma_car_av_a_k1*c...
- 22 May 2024, 11:37
- Forum: Model estimation
- Topic: Function evaluation limit exceeded.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 159
Re: Function evaluation limit exceeded.
Beatrice
bgw is the default now (the manual hasn't been updated yet). Can you show us the bfgs estimates?
Stephane
bgw is the default now (the manual hasn't been updated yet). Can you show us the bfgs estimates?
Stephane
- 22 May 2024, 11:36
- Forum: Errors during model validation and/or estimation.
- Topic: Error in MNL estimation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 23
Re: Error in MNL estimation
This could be an overspecification as a result of your specific design. To help us diagnose it, can you send us the results without ascs, and with only asc?
- 20 May 2024, 14:57
- Forum: Errors during model validation and/or estimation.
- Topic: Error when estimating a ICLV model with two sources of information
- Replies: 12
- Views: 12587
Re: Error when estimating a ICLV model with two sources of information
Hi so the issue in your code is due to the fact that when splitting across cores, only one of the model components applies in each core (as your data is sorted by source). We will develop a more elegant solution for this in future, but for now, if you add the following line after reading the data, i...