Hello,
I have a question related to the result of the standard deviation in mixture logit models using normal distribution. When the SD of one or more coefficients are not statistically different from 0, does it make sense to set that taste coefficient as fixed across respondents (and probably look ...
Important: Read this before posting to this forum
- This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
- There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
- Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
- Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
- Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
- Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
- Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
- Users can check which version they are running by entering packageVersion("apollo").
- Then check what is the latest full release (not development version) at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html.
- To update to the latest official version, just enter install.packages("apollo"). To update to a development version, download the appropriate binary file from http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html, and install the package from file
- If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
- provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
- posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. We check the forum at least twice a week. It may thus take a couple of days for your post to appear and before we reply. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.
Search found 3 matches
- 11 Dec 2024, 15:42
- Forum: Estimation results
- Topic: Mixed logit model result
- Replies: 6
- Views: 44070
- 10 Dec 2024, 21:21
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: dummy coding of variables
- Replies: 12
- Views: 84290
Re: dummy coding of variables
Hello again,
I posted a question (not valided yet) but I think I might have figured it out.
Please tell me if I am wrong:
V[['statuquo']] = asc_ref +
b_risque1_2 + ### b_risque1_2 * (column of 1)
b_risque2_1 ### b_risque2_1 * (column of 1)
Thank you in advance,
I posted a question (not valided yet) but I think I might have figured it out.
Please tell me if I am wrong:
V[['statuquo']] = asc_ref +
b_risque1_2 + ### b_risque1_2 * (column of 1)
b_risque2_1 ### b_risque2_1 * (column of 1)
Thank you in advance,
- 10 Dec 2024, 15:41
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: dummy coding of variables
- Replies: 12
- Views: 84290
Re: dummy coding of variables
Hello,
I recently switched to Apollo (from Stata) and really appreciate it! Thank you for sharing this amazing tool.
I have questions related to the dummy coding of variables, and I hope they are relevant to this post.
I have design like this
3 unlabelled alternatives (1 statu quo with fixed ...
I recently switched to Apollo (from Stata) and really appreciate it! Thank you for sharing this amazing tool.
I have questions related to the dummy coding of variables, and I hope they are relevant to this post.
I have design like this
3 unlabelled alternatives (1 statu quo with fixed ...