Hi Stephane,
thank you for the quick reply. As I understood it, it is not common to use different scales for different alternatives in prediction, right?
Best
Michael
Important: Read this before posting to this forum
- This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
- There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
- Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
- Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
- Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
- Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
- Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
- Users can check which version they are running by entering packageVersion("apollo").
- Then check what is the latest full release (not development version) at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html.
- To update to the latest official version, just enter install.packages("apollo"). To update to a development version, download the appropriate binary file from http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html, and install the package from file
- If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
- provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
- posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. We check the forum at least twice a week. It may thus take a couple of days for your post to appear and before we reply. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.
Search found 5 matches
- 21 Dec 2020, 15:14
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: Joint RP/SP estimation: interpretation of mu and estimates
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14200
- 21 Dec 2020, 14:41
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: Joint RP/SP estimation: interpretation of mu and estimates
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14200
Re: Joint RP/SP estimation: interpretation of mu and estimates
Hi Stephane,
unfortunately I cannot share any file since this work is confidential and not published yet. However, I use seperate models or each data source and combine them with apollo_combineModels. For the mu, I have
cnl_settings$V = lapply(V, "*", mu_*) % where the mu_* stands for the mu of ...
unfortunately I cannot share any file since this work is confidential and not published yet. However, I use seperate models or each data source and combine them with apollo_combineModels. For the mu, I have
cnl_settings$V = lapply(V, "*", mu_*) % where the mu_* stands for the mu of ...
- 11 Dec 2020, 11:03
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: CNL models with individual alphas
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8991
Re: CNL models with individual alphas
Hi David,
thanks for your suggestion, it worked perfectly for my case! I am looking forward to see those features in future version of Apollo.
Best,
Michael
thanks for your suggestion, it worked perfectly for my case! I am looking forward to see those features in future version of Apollo.
Best,
Michael
- 11 Dec 2020, 11:02
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: Joint RP/SP estimation: interpretation of mu and estimates
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14200
Joint RP/SP estimation: interpretation of mu and estimates
Hi all,
I recently estimated a mode choice model based on RP and SP data. Some alternatives are only available in the SP data and hence, there are parameters (e.g., travel time parameters for these modes) which are only estimated based on the SP data. The mu of the SP data is around 0.5, whereas ...
I recently estimated a mode choice model based on RP and SP data. Some alternatives are only available in the SP data and hence, there are parameters (e.g., travel time parameters for these modes) which are only estimated based on the SP data. The mu of the SP data is around 0.5, whereas ...
- 04 Dec 2020, 07:47
- Forum: Model specification
- Topic: CNL models with individual alphas
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8991
CNL models with individual alphas
Hi,
I am currently estimating CNL models for mode choice based on SP-RP data. The SP data was mainly conducted among users of a ride pooling service. Depending on their ride pooling usage (one time user vs. regular user), the alphas vary heavily. So, I wondered if there is a possibility to use ...
I am currently estimating CNL models for mode choice based on SP-RP data. The SP data was mainly conducted among users of a ride pooling service. Depending on their ride pooling usage (one time user vs. regular user), the alphas vary heavily. So, I wondered if there is a possibility to use ...