Hi David,
Thank you for your response. In regard to the second question, the attempted specification is slightly different to the one you provided. We have one sample of respondents who are asked identical questions. However, the questions for each respondent refer to a different site and we want ...
Important: Read this before posting to this forum
- This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
- There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
- Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
- Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
- Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
- Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
- Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
- Users can check which version they are running by entering packageVersion("apollo").
- Then check what is the latest full release (not development version) at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html.
- To update to the latest official version, just enter install.packages("apollo"). To update to a development version, download the appropriate binary file from http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html, and install the package from file
- If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
- provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
- posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. We check the forum at least twice a week. It may thus take a couple of days for your post to appear and before we reply. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.
Search found 3 matches
- 22 Oct 2024, 17:15
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: WTP for random coefficients in mixed logit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 40449
- 16 Oct 2024, 10:25
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: WTP for random coefficients in mixed logit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 40449
Re: WTP for random coefficients in mixed logit
Hi Stephane,
Thank you for your reply. If its okay, I have a few follow up questions.
We have used the code you provided to get WTP estimates in preference space, but found untennably high mean and sd values. This encouraged us to move to WTP space, where estimates became much more reasonable. In ...
Thank you for your reply. If its okay, I have a few follow up questions.
We have used the code you provided to get WTP estimates in preference space, but found untennably high mean and sd values. This encouraged us to move to WTP space, where estimates became much more reasonable. In ...
- 11 Sep 2024, 11:40
- Forum: Post-estimation analysis/use of results
- Topic: WTP for random coefficients in mixed logit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 40449
WTP for random coefficients in mixed logit
Hello,
I have a question about estimating WTP in the preference space.
I am estimating a mixed logit model. I have assumed all variables to be normally distributed, except for the cost variable which I have assumed as a negative lognormal, and the reference variables which I have fixed. The code ...
I have a question about estimating WTP in the preference space.
I am estimating a mixed logit model. I have assumed all variables to be normally distributed, except for the cost variable which I have assumed as a negative lognormal, and the reference variables which I have fixed. The code ...