Hi David and Stephane,
I have a question about the VTT error calculated from a RRM model. If I understood correctly the paper of Daly et al. (2012) about the computation of this measure, we calculate errors from a transformation of the parameters, and in the case of VTT is the ratio of the derivatives of the deterministic parcel of regret/utility in relation to time and cost attributes. In RRM models the VTT is not simply the ratio between the travel time and cost parameters (Chorus 2012 paper) of the alternative considered. My question then is: does it make sense to use the apollo function apollo_deltaMethod to calculate the error of this transformation for a RRM model? Or should I compute it manually? Thanks in advance.
Best,
Important: Read this before posting to this forum
- This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
- There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html. In addition, help files are available for all functions, using e.g. ?apollo_mnl
- Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
- Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
- Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
- Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
- Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
- Users can check which version they are running by entering packageVersion("apollo").
- Then check what is the latest full release (not development version) at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html.
- To update to the latest official version, just enter install.packages("apollo"). To update to a development version, download the appropriate binary file from http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/code.html, and install the package from file
- If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
- provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
- posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. This may take a day or two at busy times. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.
Delta method for RRM models
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 24 Aug 2020, 15:07
- Location: Brazil
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 977
- Joined: 24 Apr 2020, 16:29
Re: Delta method for RRM models
Hi
you definitely can't use that function in that case. But I also think you should be careful how you interpret RRM results and whether you really should refer to that calculation as VTT.
Stephane
you definitely can't use that function in that case. But I also think you should be careful how you interpret RRM results and whether you really should refer to that calculation as VTT.
Stephane
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 24 Aug 2020, 15:07
- Location: Brazil
- Contact:
Re: Delta method for RRM models
Hi Prof Stephane
Thanks for the answer. I'm using as reference the Chorus (2012) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... 011.609947 and Dekker (2014) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... via%3Dihub papers. I'm aware of the differences between the RUM approach, but I've never seen a discussion about why shouldn't refer to the derivative of dRR/dT/dRR/dC as VTT. Can you indicate some reference about this? Thanks again.
Best,
Gabriel
Thanks for the answer. I'm using as reference the Chorus (2012) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... 011.609947 and Dekker (2014) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... via%3Dihub papers. I'm aware of the differences between the RUM approach, but I've never seen a discussion about why shouldn't refer to the derivative of dRR/dT/dRR/dC as VTT. Can you indicate some reference about this? Thanks again.
Best,
Gabriel
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 977
- Joined: 24 Apr 2020, 16:29
Re: Delta method for RRM models
Gabriel
in my view, VTT is a concept grounded in micro-economic theory, and one which requires consistency with utility maximisation. See https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9651-7
You can of course calculate a measure from RRM, but what would it mean, and how could it be used in economic analysis?
Stephane
in my view, VTT is a concept grounded in micro-economic theory, and one which requires consistency with utility maximisation. See https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9651-7
You can of course calculate a measure from RRM, but what would it mean, and how could it be used in economic analysis?
Stephane