Important: Read this before posting to this forum

  1. This forum is for questions related to the use of Apollo. We will answer some general choice modelling questions too, where appropriate, and time permitting. We cannot answer questions about how to estimate choice models with other software packages.
  2. There is a very detailed manual for Apollo available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/manual.html. This contains detailed descriptions of the various Apollo functions, and numerous examples are available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com/examples.html.
  3. Before asking a question on the forum, users are kindly requested to follow these steps:
    1. Check that the same issue has not already been addressed in the forum - there is a search tool.
    2. Ensure that the correct syntax has been used. For any function, detailed instructions are available directly in Apollo, e.g. by using ?apollo_mnl for apollo_mnl
    3. Check the frequently asked questions section on the Apollo website, which discusses some common issues/failures. Please see http://www.apollochoicemodelling.com/faq.html
    4. Make sure that R is using the latest official release of Apollo.
  4. If the above steps do not resolve the issue, then users should follow these steps when posting a question:
    1. provide full details on the issue, including the entire code and output, including any error messages
    2. posts will not immediately appear on the forum, but will be checked by a moderator first. This may take a day or two at busy times. There is no need to submit the post multiple times.

The following words in search query were ignored because they are too common words: robust, standard error, MDCEV

Post Reply
doosun1
Posts: 3
Joined: 19 Jun 2021, 19:39

The following words in search query were ignored because they are too common words: robust, standard error, MDCEV

Post by doosun1 » 28 Jun 2021, 05:45

The forum search has a habit of rejecting the very words I want to search on, because it says they are too common.

If it was just words like "the", "it", "why", that would make sense, but it's technical, relevant keywords, most of the time, like "robust", "standard error", "p-value", "MDCEV" ... and many others.

If the forum is to avoid having people ask the same questions over and over, even though they've been answered many times before, I think it would help if that could be turned off, or limited to non-technical words, so people could actually find relevant topics by searching, and not have to ask someone.

I hope that I can search with keywords I want to check, as before in google groups.

Thanks :D
Top
stephanehess
Site Admin
Posts: 558
Joined: 24 Apr 2020, 16:29

Re: The following words in search query were ignored because they are too common words: robust, standard error, MDCEV

Post by stephanehess » 29 Jun 2021, 11:07

Hi

thanks for pointing this out to us. It should be sorted now

Stephane
--------------------------------
Stephane Hess
www.stephanehess.me.uk
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Other”